Author: Huxleў
© Huxleў - almanac about philosophy, business, art and science.
7 minutes for reading


Share material
Illustration: Vsevolod Shvaiba, Dryads, pencil on paper, 30x40cm


Read Part I




In domestic literature, for me a completely unique figure is Vikenty Veresaev, who has been worked in Ukraine for many years and left us an amazing Notes of a Doctor. I advise all doctors – both beginners and long-term practitioners – to re-read the book once a year – they perfectly clear brains. Veresaev dotted the “i’s” very well – both in relation to philosophy of life, and in relation to the medical profession.

After the publication of Notes of a Doctor in 1903, he faced some monstrous barrage of criticism. His last words were reviled by doctors, journalists, officials, and ordinary people – everyone who believed that they knew better medicine than he did. Sometimes it seems to me that in modern Ukraine I largely repeat Veresaev’s path.

Those who reject the achievements of science, do not want to follow morality – these are all the same types that can be found in the Notes of a Doctor. Just like a hundred years ago, everyone who thinks logically and intellectually honestly, tries to follow the norms of the profession and morality, these people are declared an enemy.

When you sit in the library at night, torment yourself in search of answers to the “damn questions”, your opponents eat and drink well, sleep soundly in their soft beds. They did not learn anything, they do not care about anything except their trough. But they are always ready to declare that you have read all sorts of nonsense, and arrange for you the most real persecution. It is how Ukrainian society was in the time of Veresaev, and it remains so now.

But it is interesting that Veresaev did not remain silent and did not give up. His answer was the second volume of the Notes of a Doctor entitled Regarding the “Doctor’s Notes”. Answer to My Critics – it is the highest example of intelligence, intellect and morality. It would be great if every young man who dreams of becoming a doctor, deciding to enter a medical school, first read Veresaev. Then he will understand what he will have to face in reality if he really wants to become a good doctor.




It just so happened that I was no stranger to the craft of writing. There is even a section on my website, which, of course, is called in Veresaev’s language – Notes of a Doctor. There are several of my stories, I’m interested in trying myself in small forms. I like to write. And, frankly, I would gladly settle in some wilderness, in a house on the river bank, go fishing and write a novel about the madness of medical life in our country.

But I do not have such an opportunity – I am responsible for my family and many people who are next to me. I certainly cannot be called a system writer, although I have some idea of ​​what writing is. Still, I am the author of 13 books: one monograph and 12 popular science works. I am in demand in this particular genre, and people need it much more than my works of art.

Trust me, it costs a lot to be the author of a popular childcare book. In response, I receive dozens of letters every day from readers, which begin with the words, “Doctor, today your book has saved my child’s life”.

After that, you realize that you have no right to waste time on a novel. Moreover, as I said above, doctors are very pragmatic and take a sober view of life – the writer Komarovsky is unlikely to be able to surpass his great predecessors… I read both classics and modern authors with pleasure. I enjoy the mastery of the syllable and the ease with which my beloved Weller or Akunin write. It seems to me that a good writer is one who is easy to read by the majority, and a bad one always hides in the circle of the elite.




I often ask myself and others the question, “Why are some people real leaders, while others unsuccessfully stylize like them?” One of my recent interlocutors, an influential Ukrainian lawyer, gave the following characterization to the team that now runs the Ukrainian state, “They need some kind of adult there!” Without a doubt, leadership is a huge responsibility. It’s always about maturity, not about infantilism.

I, as a doctor, have a specific educational mission. And I have no such goal – to impose my opinion on the politics and governance of the country on someone, because political views are always extremely subjective. And my task, as well as the attitude of all modern medicine, is to avoid subjectivity as much as possible. When a child fell and broke his knee (and this situation occurs millions of times every day in the world), it is absolutely unacceptable if 100 doctors give 100 different recommendations on this matter.

There are rare and complex medical cases, but they are a statistical minority. 21st century medicine has a standard recommendation for any standard situation. Therefore, I see it as my duty to introduce people to this information. So that they know how to behave in typical situations and not make mistakes. By itself, this information is not exclusive, for the most part it is known to representatives of the medical community.

Another thing is how I convey this information, how efficiently and easily I do it, adapting standard recommendations to the real conditions of our country. And here, of course, I show some of my vision, some individual art. In fact, what am I trying to do?

Imagine a typical children’s room, with a typical crib, around which a typical grandmother fusses with a can of goat fat and a typical mother wants to steam the child’s feet in a basin of boiling water. It is into this stuffy, archaic atmosphere that I try to let in the fresh air of modern medicine. My task is to send the grandmother to deal with the grandfather, and to give the mother recommendations on how to do the right thing in this situation.




At the outpatient level, the pediatrician communicates 99% with adults. My task is to convince them that they are responsible for the health of the child. To grow it healthy, you need basic knowledge – you have to study. You must understand that the lifestyle of children now and 30 years ago is absolutely incomparable, so the experience of grandmothers is unlikely to be useful to you.

I convince adults that every decisions related to children should not worsen the life of dad and mom. You should not follow the path of 70% of families that do not pass the test in the first year of a child’s life and fall apart. The child needs loving each other, happy mom and dad – he needs it more than anything else.

It is not as easy path for a doctor as it seems. It has very serious barriers: the financial situation of people, their intellectual and cultural level – people often simply do not understand what you are talking about. In addition, a huge number of medical recommendations cannot be implemented, because the state has created conditions under which they cannot be implemented.

You can sound the alarm as much as you like about the epidemic of childhood obesity, about the dangers of gadgets… But when you tell parents what they should do and what should not do, you feel exactly like Veresaev, who confessed, “I feel bad when I recommend to a laundress with eczema not to wet her hands!”

I am aware that in order to really help children and their parents, it is necessary to radically change people’s attitude to their health – nothing will work out without the intervention of the state. And then, inevitably, you begin to think about leadership, which goes beyond medical knowledge. You start looking for those tools that can force those in power to make decisions that make life easier for people.


By joining the Huxleў friends club, you support philosophy, science and art




I am often accused for allegedly paradoxical and provocative formulations. It is not true. Yes, I love humor, it is a property of my thinking. In general, humor in medicine helps out a lot – it is a kind of defensive reaction when you have to balance on the brink of life and death. But the humor of a medic is one thing, and when journalists twist your words for the sake of a hype, it is quite another.

For example, in an interview with a journalist, I say that two physical education lessons at school for 45 minutes a week are very few. Because the minimum medical norm is 40 minutes of physical activity per day. It is necessary that children after school stay in school and play sports, and do not run home, buried in smartphones.

School physical education should not be a profanity – physical education in the first lesson, after which the child then sits in sweat for another five hours, no one needs. Seemingly obvious things, everything is logical and correct. But suddenly my interview comes out with the following title Komarovsky: Physical Education in Schools is not Needed! Provocation? Paradox? Of course! But, excuse me, I didn’t come up with all this!

At first, I reacted very painfully to such things, tried to make excuses, to refute. In the end, I just stopped doing it. My team and I are trying to track publications that mention Komarovsky, but it is becoming more and more difficult. There isn’t a day in Ukraine that my name is not mentioned in at least 200 publications. But there is also Belarus, Kazakhstan, Russia…




Do I feel some envy from politicians? Of course. Some are annoyed by the popularity ofKomarovsky. Others want to use it. There is probably not a single major political force in Ukraine whose messengers would not appear in my office. True, there is one problem: political leaders really want me to stand next to them on the pre-election stage, but at the same time they want me to stand next to them in silence.

When I say that politics needs to return the moral dimension, that the country needs to be treated as a sick person is treated, it is not interesting to anyone. Politicians only care about how they can monetize my fame. And there is another big obstacle on the way to a political career – I can’t stand to have power over other people. It always weighs on me terribly.

I am aware that politics is becoming more and more immoral and even criminal; those who create it have terribly distorted concepts of good and evil, professionalism and decency. Therefore, I have always distanced myself from politics, although lately it itself is getting closer and closer to me.

Of course, Ukrainian politics takes revenge for such an attitude towards itself. But 9 million followers on Instagram and 3 million on YouTube save me from its aggression. It is cheaper and safer for politicians not to notice me, because any dishonest game on their part will result in colossal reputational costs for them. I help my subscribers to be healthy and happy, and they help me to be myself and say what I think.




Could I be wrong? Yes, like any person. But here it is important to correctly build communication with oneself according to the principle of “never again”. A mistake is a reason to draw adequate conclusions and not repeat it again. Let me give you an example. The doctor examines the child, he has a temperature of 37.5 and a slightly red throat. Naturally, you don’t see anything terrible, the situation is standard, everything is fine.

However, it may happen that this particular child has one in 10 thousand! – these are signs of meningococcal nasopharyngitis, which tomorrow transforms into purulent meningitis. But today none of them can be understood and seen – it is not diagnosed on the first day! Today you look at a child and say, “It’s okay,” and the next day he has the symptoms of meningitis. What do your parents think of you? You are a killer!

So, there are two options: to put up with it and accept it as the inevitable curse of your profession and not to prescribe meningitis medications to 9,999 people who do not need them. Or you can say, “I don’t want to hear terrible accusations from my parents anymore, so every child with a red throat will be prescribed an antibiotic on the very first day”. The vast majority of my colleagues follow the second path. Is it a medical mistake? Undoubtedly, but society deserves it.

The real mistake is when you find yourself in a situation that you did not foresee, although you could. And, having done it once, you will then try to avoid it all your life. I remember that in the first or second year of medical practice, I was brought to a suffocating child in some remote village. He was already unconscious. I quickly inserted the tube down his throat.

Foam started pouring out of it, and suddenly I found out that there was no electric suction nearby to suck it off. And I again had to take this tube out, because the child would suffocate… Believe me, after such a mistake I will never repeat it. And every time, before putting up the phone, I will ask 150 times, “Do you have an electric pump?”

You learn from mistakes – there is no other option. I have told many times about the case in the city of Kharkov in 1981. Then I put in my first subclavian catheter. So, we made these catheters out of the trim of the radio wires, which we took at the radio factory. Yes, and such medicine was then in the USSR. Then we realized that we were wrong – white wires suited our purposes much better than transparent ones.




From a moral point of view, medical decision making and business must be clearly separated from each other. When a doctor perceives his medical decision as a business and builds a business model based on it, it is very dangerous.

In this case, the doctor is interested in making you sick, seriously ill, so that you require expensive medications, expensive examinations… When you come to a service station to repair your car, you have at least some knowledge about how the internal combustion system works… But when you come to a doctor to repair your heart, you don’t know anything about your heart, and, to be honest, you don’t really want to. Therefore, you can do whatever you want, invent any kind of manipulation.

Unfortunately, our society itself has created just such an ugly, immoral model of providing medical services – according to the principle “we do not pay you, but you earn from us”. In Ukraine, it turns out that if the patients are healthy, then the doctors die of hunger. And then the mechanisms of corruption are connected.

And not so much at the level of clinics, but at the level of the highest state power, which is treated in other places and countries than Ukrainian citizens. And the authorities are extremely disinterested in foreign insurance companies entering our country.

But health insurance is the only way out that I see. When an insurance company undertakes an assessment of medical manipulations in terms of their rationality and validity.


Photos courtesy of Yevgeny Komarovsky

By joining the Huxleў friends club, you support philosophy, science and art
Share material

Spelling error report

The following text will be sent to our editors: